SAMPLE — FICTIONAL CLIENT

← AI Build Concierge

Build Blueprint — Sample

Cascade Ridge Builders LLC — Job Scheduling + Lead Follow-Up System

SAMPLE — FICTIONAL CLIENT. Cascade Ridge Builders does not exist. Every name, number, and quote in this document is invented so prospects can see exactly what a paid Build Blueprint contains before buying one. A real Blueprint is built from the client's own intake answers, a workflow interview, and their actual tool/data access — the structure, depth, and fixed-price format below are the real thing.

Prepared for"Cascade Ridge Builders LLC" — residential remodeling contractor, 11 field staff + 2 office, ~$1.9M/yr revenue (fictional)
Prepared byAI Build Concierge
Blueprint price$995 flat — credited in full toward the Managed Build below if the client proceeds within 60 days
Delivery7 calendar days from paid intake
VerdictBUILD — but build simpler than asked. The scheduling half is a configuration job on tools the client already pays for. The follow-up half is the real build. Details §2–§4.

1. Problem map

The client came in asking for "a custom app that runs our whole business." The interview found four actual problems, in cost order:

#ProblemWhat it costs them (client's own estimates, fictional)
P1Leads go cold. New inquiries land in a shared inbox and the owner's phone. Nobody owns follow-up; the owner estimates 3–5 jobs a year are lost to slow/no response. At a ~$28k average remodel, that's $84k–$140k/yr of revenue walking away.Highest cost, cheapest fix
P2Scheduling lives in three places. A whiteboard in the office, the owner's calendar, and a group text. Double-bookings and crew-shows-up-with-no-materials days happen ~twice a month.Real, but a process problem first
P3Change orders are verbal. Scope changes agreed on-site never reach the invoice. Client estimates ~2% of revenue leaks here (~$38k/yr).Fixed by one form, not an app
P4No view of the pipeline. The owner cannot answer "what's booked in the next 6 weeks and what's it worth" without an hour of digging.Solved as a by-product of P1+P2

What we are NOT solving in v1: payroll, estimating/bid generation, accounting (QuickBooks already works), a customer-facing portal, and the "custom app" itself. Each is named in §5 as explicitly out of scope — that list is part of what the Blueprint fee buys.

2. Workflow audit — before / after

Workflow stepBefore (today)After (with v1)
Lead arrives (web form, referral, phone)Shared inbox + owner's personal phone; first response in 4–48 hrs, if at allEvery lead auto-enters the CRM pipeline within 1 minute; owner/office gets an instant alert; first-response target < 15 min in work hours
Lead follow-upMemory. No cadence, no record. Leads silently die after 1–2 touchesAutomated follow-up sequence (day 0 / 2 / 5 / 10) by email+SMS, written in the owner's voice, stops the moment a human replies; every touch logged on the lead
Estimate bookedPhone tag; appointment in owner's calendar onlyBooking link sends confirmation + reminder to both sides; job record created automatically
Job schedulingWhiteboard + group text; office re-types everything twiceOne shared crew calendar (the tool they already pay for, properly structured §4); a change in one place is the only change
Change order on siteVerbal agreement, handshake60-second mobile form: description, photos, price delta, client taps approve → signed PDF + line item queued for the invoice
InvoicingOffice reconstructs the job from texts and memoryInvoice draft assembles from the job record (contract + approved change orders); human reviews and sends
Pipeline viewAn hour of diggingOne dashboard: next 6 weeks booked, value by stage, stale leads flagged

3. Context-engineering assets included

This is the part a generic builder skips, and the reason AI output sounds like this business instead of a template. The Managed Build includes building and handing over:

All context assets are the client's property, delivered as plain documents they can hand to any future builder.

4. Build spec (v1 — pinned)

In scope:

  1. CRM pipeline (leads → contacted → estimate booked → quoted → won/lost) with the automated follow-up sequences of §2, on the client's existing accounts.
  2. Crew scheduling board: one calendar structure, color by crew, materials-needed field per job day, daily 6 AM text to each crew lead with their day.
  3. Change-order mobile form with client e-approval and PDF record, feeding the invoice draft.
  4. Invoice draft assembly from the job record (human sends; no auto-send).
  5. Owner dashboard: 6-week booked value, pipeline by stage, stale-lead list.
  6. Training: two recorded walkthroughs (owner, office) + a one-page runbook.

Out of scope (explicit): custom mobile app, customer portal, estimating engine, payroll, accounting migration, website rebuild, marketing/ads. Quoting any of these later is a separate Blueprint or a change order — never a mid-build addition.

Acceptance test: v1 is accepted when (a) a test lead travels inbox → follow-up sequence → booked estimate with no human touching it until the reply, (b) a test change order is approved on a phone and appears on the invoice draft, (c) the dashboard's booked value matches a hand count for the same week. The QA bot runs this checklist against this spec before handoff; it fails loudly, it does not pass silently.

5. Recommended stack

LayerChoiceWhy
CRM + pipelineHubSpot Free → Starter when volume forces itClient's office manager already knows it; free tier covers v1 lead volume; no migration
SchedulingGoogle Workspace calendars, restructured + a shared crew viewAlready paid for. The problem was structure, not software — buying a scheduling platform here would be waste
AutomationMake (n8n if the client later wants self-hosting)Connects form → CRM → SMS/email → calendar without custom code to maintain
MessagingTwilio (SMS) + existing GmailPay-per-use, ~$15–30/mo at this volume
Change ordersMobile web form (Tally/Typeform-class) → PDF → job recordNo app store, works on any crew phone today
DashboardThe CRM's native reporting + one automation-fed summary sheetNo BI tool to learn

Custom code in v1: none. That is a deliberate verdict, not a limitation — everything above is configuration + automation + the context assets of §3. If the business doubles, the Blueprint's §8 names the trigger points where custom code starts paying for itself.

6. Timeline

PhaseDurationOwner
Blueprint (this document)7 days from paid intakeAI Build Concierge
Client decision windowUp to 60 days — the $995 credit holdsClient
Managed Build: setup + automation wiringWeeks 1–2Concierge + builder bench
Voice pack + sequences, owner approval roundWeek 2Client (one ~45-min review)
Change-order form + dashboard + acceptance testWeek 3Concierge QA
Training + handoverWeek 4Both
Total, decision → live~4 weeks

7. Fixed price

ItemPriceTerms
Build Blueprint (this document)$995Paid at intake. Credited in full toward the Managed Build
Managed Build v1 (spec §4, complete)$8,900 fixed50% ($4,450) to start, 50% on acceptance test passed. 2 revision rounds included. Kill fee: if the client stops the build mid-flight, work-to-date is invoiced at the milestone reached and everything built is handed over — no hostage code
Care Retainer (optional, from go-live)$750/moAutomation monitoring, sequence tuning, small changes (≤2 hrs/mo), monthly pipeline report. Tool costs (Make, Twilio, CRM tiers) pass through at cost — estimated $40–80/mo at this volume
Client's real first-year picture$8,900 + ~$9,000 retainer + ~$700 tools ≈ $18,600Against one recovered remodel job (~$28k revenue) the system has paid for itself; P1's estimate was 3–5 jobs/yr

All prices inside the Concierge's published pricing (Blueprint $995 flat · Managed Build $3,500–$15,000 · Retainer $500–$1,500/mo). Fixed means fixed: if the build takes longer than §6, that is our cost, not the client's — scope changes go through a written change order priced before work starts.

8. Risks — stated, not buried

RiskHonest readMitigation in this plan
The follow-up sequences sound robotic and hurt the brandThe #1 real risk. Bad automation is worse than slow humansVoice pack from the owner's real messages (§3); owner approves every sequence before it sends; any reply stops automation instantly
Office manager resists a new pipelineAdoption kills more small-business systems than technology doesv1 keeps her tools (HubSpot, Google) and removes her worst task (re-typing); she is trained first, owner second
Lead volume is lower than estimated, so P1's payoff shrinksPossible — the $84k+ figure is the owner's estimate, not measured dataThe Retainer's monthly report measures actual recovered leads; if the number is ~zero after 90 days, the honest recommendation is to cut the retainer, and this Blueprint says so in advance
Platform dependency (Make/HubSpot pricing changes)Real but slow-movingAll data lives in the client's own accounts; context assets are portable documents; exit cost is days, not months
Scope creep toward "run our whole business"The original ask, and the classic margin/reputation killer§4's out-of-scope list is contractual; new ideas get their own Blueprint

9. Next-step offer

  1. Proceed to Managed Build at the fixed $8,900 — the $995 Blueprint fee is credited, so starting costs $3,455 net new money (first milestone $4,450 − $995 credit). Signature on the MSA + SOW starts the clock.
  2. Or take this Blueprint anywhere. It is the client's property — spec, stack, and context assets are complete enough for any competent builder to execute. We'd rather earn the build than trap it.
  3. Or don't build. If the interview numbers were optimistic, the correct move may be a $0 version: the follow-up cadence of §2 run manually from a spreadsheet for 60 days to measure P1 before spending anything. This Blueprint's audit tables are structured so the client can do exactly that.

Contracts (mutual NDA, MSA, SOW with IP assignment to the client) are provided before any payment beyond the Blueprint. The client owns the code, the data, and every context asset from day one.